BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Authors Evaluation
Lian YJ, Lu JN, Ru QC, Zhu YK, Yu ZY, Guo X. Preoperative anxiety and depression predict two-year outcomes after total hip or knee arthroplasty. World J Psychiatry 2026; 16(6): 116745 [DOI: 10.5498/wjp.v16.i6.116745]
Evaluation of a Journal’s Credibility by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a journal’s credibility is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the manuscript editing and publishing process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the online submission system?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the peer review report?
Yes
3 Are you satisfied with the editing quality of the article?
Yes
4 Are you satisfied with the article PDFs?
Yes
5 Are you satisfied with the online full-text article?
Yes
6 Are you satisfied with the prepared figures in the online full-text article?
Yes
7 Are you satisfied with the prepared tables in the online full-text article?
Yes
8 Are you satisfied with the published articles processes?
Yes
9 Are you satisfied with the requirement for providing academic rules and norms?
Yes
10 Are you satisfied with the academic misconduct detection report?
Yes
11 Are you satisfied with the period of publication?
Yes
12 Are you satisfied with the editing and publishing rules and norms?
Yes
Evaluation of a Journal’s Peer Review by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a given journal’s peer review is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the peer review process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the time spent for peer review?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the anonymous peer review process?
Yes
3 Is the peer review report of great help to your manuscript?
Yes
4 Do you think the peer review report for your manuscript is fair or objective?
Yes
Author‘s Comments
I am truly honored to share that our paper has been published in the World Journal of Pediatrics (WJP). First and foremost, I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my supervisor for their invaluable guidance and encouragement throughout this journey. My thanks also go to all co-authors and team members for their dedicated collaboration. I deeply appreciate the editorial team and the anonymous reviewers for their rigorous and constructive comments, which greatly improved our manuscript. Special thanks go to the children and families who participated in this study — your trust and support give our research its true purpose and meaning. The road from submission to acceptance was challenging. Each round of revision and every critical comment pushed us to re-examine our study design and reasoning. Yet it is precisely this rigorous peer review process that has made our work stronger and more credible. There were moments of anxiety and self-doubt — especially after receiving a "major revision" decision — but looking back, those were the times when I grew the most as a researcher. Seeing our paper finally published online brought both a sense of relief and a deep feeling of fulfillment — a reminder that no late night or line of code was wasted. For a researcher in pediatrics, being able to leave a mark in a journal like WJP is not only a great encouragement but also a meaningful responsibility. Of course, publication is not the end — it is a new beginning. Moving forward, I will continue to translate clinical questions into scientific investigations and strive to make contributions that truly matter to pediatric practice. Once again, thank you to everyone who supported us along the way. I wish all my colleagues and fellow researchers the very best in getting your work published as well.